In the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio, a case well known by Orange County drug defense lawyers, the United States Supreme Court held that the police can only perform a warrantless pat down search when the police have:
- reasonable suspicion;
- based on articulable facts;
- that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity; and
- that the defendant was armed and dangerous.
So if evidence can be suppressed by the defendant's drug defense lawyer and the cop can be sued, why do the cops continue to regularly perform illegal pat down searches? Because the cops don't really care if the evidence ends up getting suppressed. It doesn't affect the cop one bit. And as for a civil lawsuit, that costs money. Even those defendants with the means to sue a cop usually don't want to expend the energy and time for a small damage award. They are just happy their drug defense lawyer got them out of trouble. Thus, there really is no consequence for the cop. That's why the illegal pat down search continue to be standard practice in police encounters.
If you would like to speak to an experienced Orange County drug defense lawyer call The Law Offices of EJ Stopyro at (949) 559-5500. We offer a free and confidential telephonic consultation.
No comments:
Post a Comment