The recent case of Missouri v. Mcneely has certainly rocked the foundation of the DUI defense world. As an Orange County DUI Lawyer I have been asked by many people, defendants and outer DUI lawyers, about the ramifications of Mcneely. Missouri v. Mcneely was a case decided in April of this year in which the United States Supreme Court seems to have invalidated the Implied Consent laws of all states by holding that a warrant is required in order to take a blood sample from a person arrested for DUI.
In July of
this year, the 1st District California Court of Appeal decided seven
consolidated cases in which all defendants had been arrested for DUI and had
elected to take a blood test. However, it doesn’t appear that the
DUI Attorneys in the cases actually challenged the blood tests on the
grounds that a warrant was required. Rather, these cases dealt with the issue
of whether the blood tests taken after the DUI arrests were shown to have been
conducted in a medically approved manner as prescribed by the landmark case of Schmerber v. California. In all seven cases, the DUI Lawyers brought a suppression motion in the
trial court. At the suppression motions, the prosecutors proof that the blood tests were conducted in a medically
approved manner consisted of the testimony of the arresting police officer, NOT
from the blood tech who actually performed the blood draw.
Amazingly,
the 1st Division actually upheld the denial of the suppression
motions, holding that the testimony of the police officers was sufficient to
prove that the blood tests were properly conducted, despite no showing of any
medical knowledge or training by the police officers. Hopefully, this decision
will be revisited.
The bottom
line is that we are still waiting for a California decision defining exactly
how Missouri v. Mcneely will impact
California’s implied consent law. Therefore, I think that DUI Attorneys in Orange County should continue to file suppression
motions in all cases where a blood or breath test was taken in compliance to California’s
implied consent law. Although the motions are bound to be denied, your DUI
lawyer should make sure to preserve your rights by appealing the denial of the
suppression motion. That way, when a California decision on the legality of Implied
Consent does come down, the DUI conviction may actually be overturned.
If you have
been arrested for a DUI or DUI with injury, call The Law Offices of EJ Stopyro today at (949) 559-5500 today for a free and confidential consultation.
No comments:
Post a Comment